



















Wednesday, Nov 05, 2025 22:30 [IST]
Last Update: Tuesday, Nov 04, 2025 16:52 [IST]
Every now and then, news and video clips regarding bribes or
bribery prominently appear in print, electronic, and social media. These
negative “breaking” items tend to attract our attention faster than expected.
Those among us who genuinely care for society and its well-being not only get
upset but also try to discuss their manifestations, impacts, and tentacles with
friends and well-wishers.
The issue of corruption is perennially—and often hotly—debated in seminars, closed-door meetings, social gatherings, and public discourses.
Corruption: The Conceptual Aspect
Corruption means deviation from an established or desired
path. Internationally, a corrupt person is considered dishonest—especially one
resorting to bribery. It is, nevertheless, an immoral activity, implying that
what ought to be becomes infructuous in the face of what is.
Hence, it becomes difficult, if not impossible, to detect and pinpoint such
unfair practices.
Corruption, per se, may not only refer to the practice of
giving and accepting cash for day-to-day work. It also has a dangerous
combination of money and favors in kind. In public life, there are individuals
who neither take cash nor allow visible inflows of goods into their households,
yet resort to corrupt practices of an invisible nature.
There are also people who, through seemingly “honest” deeds,
ensure benefits in cash or kind for others—thus guaranteeing for themselves
positions or ranks not normally achievable through fair means. They succeed in
building a good, enduring, and usable image.
Needless to say, even those who are not habitually corrupt
sometimes become occasionally corrupt. Thus, locating or pinpointing an
entirely fair and honest person is not easy.
Available Anti-Corruption Mechanisms
A dedicated Vigilance Awareness Fortnight is observed
annually by Central and State Governments in November. During this period,
people are sensitized about the malaise of corruption and warned of its
consequences. Unfortunately, this momentum often fades once the event ends.
In addition, there are offices such as the Central Vigilance
Commission, State Vigilance Commissions, Chief Vigilance Officers in Public
Sector Undertakings, the CBI, Enforcement Directorate, and State
Anti-Corruption Bureaus. However, many of these institutions have failed to
live up to expectations. They often perform mere lip service, acting only on
fixed instructions from the top.
Mere talk about corruption is insufficient. It is our duty
to provide clues, highlight cases, and assist investigating authorities so that
the guilty are brought to justice swiftly. Sadly, the rate of conviction in
registered cases remains abysmally poor.
The reinterpretation of the term “public servant” by the
Supreme Court in the Vineet Narain case was a welcome step. It helped
implicate and convict several tainted politicians. In earlier times, it was
mainly officers and staff who had to prove their innocence, while their
political masters escaped punishment. Prominent examples include the Coal
Ministry and the Bihar Fodder Scam.
Emerging and Latent Instances of Corruption
If we care about public safety, it is essential to be
vigilant about the following indicative (not exhaustive) instances:
A Classic Case: K. K. Gautam, Former DSP, Uttar Pradesh
Police
All that glitters is not gold. Similarly, not everything
reported in the media may be true—yet, as the saying goes, there is no smoke
without fire.
The case of Shri K. K. Gautam, then Town Inspector of
Bareilly, reported by journalist Usman Saifi, is illustrative. Known for his
integrity, Gautam was asked by his Inspector General to arrange a monthly
collection of ?1 lakh. Shocked, he refused. When matters worsened, Gautam struck
a deal to trap the IG’s aide, who was caught red-handed collecting the bribe.
The news caused ripples across Uttar Pradesh and beyond.
Though initially suspended, Gautam fought back legally. With the support of
eminent advocates, including Ram Jethmalani and Arun Jaitley, he
won his case in the Allahabad High Court, was reinstated, and later promoted to
DSP before retirement.
Moral of the Story:
Never give up, even if honest superiors fail to protect you. The courts remain
an option. However, justice often depends on influential intervention—something
not available to every aggrieved officer.
Unfortunately, even the judiciary is not immune to criticism. Courts must also be proactive and uphold the spirit of justice, as they did in Vineet Narain.
To Sum Up
Mine is not the last word—nor should it be.
This is merely a viewpoint drawn from experience.
Apart from noble intentions, nothing else is intended.