



















Thursday, Jun 04, 2026 10:00 [IST]
Last Update: Wednesday, Jun 03, 2026 16:52 [IST]
The controversy surrounding CBSE’s On-Screen
Marking (OSM) system is not merely about a technical glitch. It is about the
dangerous consequences of rolling out poorly-tested digital systems in
institutions that determine the future of millions of students.
Technology, when used responsibly, can improve
transparency, efficiency and speed. But blind digitisation without preparedness
can become deeply damaging. The recent chaos surrounding CBSE’s digital
evaluation process has exposed exactly that.
Students reported blurred scans, missing supplementary
sheets, incorrect page totals and even answer sheets belonging to someone else.
Many who had successfully cleared highly competitive examinations like JEE
Mains were left shocked by inexplicably poor board results. For anxious
students and parents, this was not just a software failure. It was a collapse
of trust.
Even more alarming are the cybersecurity concerns now
emerging. A 19-year-old student reportedly identified vulnerabilities in the
OSM portal months before the controversy exploded and informed CERT-In, only to
be ignored. Another teenager later alleged irregularities in the tendering
process itself. If young students could identify such glaring loopholes, what
were the highly-paid experts and authorities doing?
The issue goes beyond CBSE. It reflects a worrying
national trend where digital transformation is treated as a fashionable
administrative slogan rather than a serious institutional responsibility.
Public systems handling sensitive educational data cannot function like
experimental start-ups. Capacity, scalability and cybersecurity are not
optional add-ons; they are the backbone of any credible digital infrastructure.
The Centre’s decision to order an inquiry and transfer
top CBSE officials is welcome, but accountability cannot stop at symbolic
action. Students who lost marks, opportunities and peace of mind deserve
answers.
India’s youth already battle enormous academic pressure. The least institutions can offer them is competence, fairness and reliability. Technology should strengthen education, not turn it into a gamble.
