Sunday, Jul 13, 2025 06:15 [IST]
Last Update: Sunday, Jul 13, 2025 00:41 [IST]
Gangtok, the
capital of Sikkim, is known for its scenic landscapes, rich biodiversity, and
natural water sources. Among these, springs locally called dharashave
always been a vital part of the city's everyday life. These springs, fed by
rainfall and groundwater recharge, provide water for drinking, household use,
and agriculture. They also support urban greenery and hold deep cultural and
religious meaning. But despite their importance, many springs are now at risk
due to growing urbanisation and environmental changes.
With support
from the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), a
fieldbased and GISsupported study was carried out to map and assess springs
across all 19 municipal wards of Gangtok. The objective was to document their
distribution, assess their current condition, and understand their broader
socio-ecological significance. This work helped in understanding how springs
connect people, nature, and cultureand how fragile that connection has become.
Mapping and Types of Springs
The study
recorded 56 springs. Deorali Ward had the highest number (17.8%), followed by
Burtuk and Tadong. Each spring was mapped using GIS, helping visualise their
spread across the city.
Based on
seasonal flow, springs were divided into two types: perennial and intermittent.
Perennial springs flow throughout the year and are generally sustained by
consistent groundwater levels. Intermittent springs, on the other hand, flow
only during certain monthsusually the monsoonand dry up during lean periods. In
the study, about 73% of the springs were found to be perennial and 27%
intermittent. This reflects both the importance of springs as a year-round
water source and the challenges related to seasonal variability.
Discharge and Seasonal Availability
Discharge data
was collected between February and April, a relatively dry period in Gangtok.
This allowed us to understand how springs perform during months of low
groundwater recharge. Among the springs where discharge was measured, 64% had
moderate flow (5–15 L/min), 24% had low flow (less than 5 L/min), and only 12%
had high discharge. These numbers show that while some springs can meet basic
household needs, many are vulnerable to drying up in dry seasons.
Community
Involvement and Maintenance
Ownership
records showed that 58.1% of springs were privately owned and 41.8% were under
government ownership. But ownership didn’t always determine who maintained the
springs. Across many wards, it was the local communities that were responsible
for looking after them. People cleaned the spring outlets, managed flow, and
even built small reservoirs or collection points. In many governmentowned sites
too, residents were the ones keeping the springs in use. This shows the
importance of recognising communityled conservation in any water planning
effort.
Cultural
Importance of Springs
A large number
of springs, nearly 87%, were considered sacred by residents. Several were
associated with Naag deities (serpent gods) and continue to be worshipped
during festivals like Naag Panchami and Chhath Puja. In some places, people
believe that the spring water has healing properties. These cultural
connections have kept many springs alive, even where there’s no formal
protection. Rituals like cleaning the spring, offering prayers, and decorating
the space also bring communities together, turning springs into gathering
points.
Infrastructure and Storage
Springs that had
proper storage tanks or reservoirs were found to serve larger groups of people
more efficiently. These structures were likely built through government schemes
or local initiatives. In contrast, in some areas, springs had very basic infrastructurelike
buckets at the outlet to collect and store water. While not ideal, these
solutions show how people have adapted to manage spring water with what they
have. This gap in infrastructure shows the need for targeted support in areas
that rely heavily on springs.
Piped
Supply vs. Natural Springs
To understand
how spring availability compares with piped water supply, a statistical
analysis was done using data on litres per capita per day (LPCD), population,
and number of springs in each ward.
The analysis
showed a moderate positive correlation between population and number of
springs. This suggests that denser settlements may have developed around
waterrich areas. However, LPCD didn’t show any strong link with either
population or spring count. This highlights the need to plan piped supply
systems better while also valuing local sources like springs.
Accessibility
and Infrastructure Gaps
Most springs
were easy to access, located within 0.1 to 0.4 km from roads or houses. But in
some wards like Tathangchen, springs were deeper inside forested or hilly
terrain and not easily reachable. The condition of infrastructure also varied.
Some springs had proper structures, while others had none. These differences
point to the need for areaspecific interventions, especially in places with
fewer resources or limited government support.
Why
Spring Preservation Matters
Almost everyone
interviewed during the survey agreed on one thing-springs must be protected.
People expressed concern about changing rainfall patterns, deforestation, and
falling groundwater levels. Yet, this concern also came with a sense of
responsibility. Many communities already care for these water sources without
waiting for official recognition. If given more supportthrough funding,
training, or better policiesthey could play a central role in conserving these
springs.
Conclusion
Springs in
Gangtok are not just water points, they are part of the city’s cultural memory,
ecology, and everyday survival. As climate pressures increase and cities
expand, preserving these springs is not just about protecting nature; it’s
about protecting livelihoods and traditions. Strengthening both formal
infrastructure and communityled efforts can help create a more secure and
sustainable water future for Gangtok.
(NiharikaBindal
is currently working as a research intern at Ashoka trust for research in
Ecology and Environment (ATREE) under the supervision of Dr SailendraDewan)